Could Nicodemus have been "born again" then, or would he have had to wait until Christ was resurrected? [John 3:1-21, John 7:39, Isaiah 32:15, Joel 2:28-29, Zechariah 14:8, Matthew 10:8, Luke 10:9].
Can you clarify the confusion in scripture about the ascended Jesus, saying that the Son of Man is in heaven, when clearly at that point He is not? [John 3:10-13].
Could you clarify the order of events for both the Premillennial View and the Amillennial View of Jesus' return and the rapture? [John 6:39, John 6:44, John 6:54. 2 Peter 3:13].
Would you explain the verse about "no one has ascended into heaven" except Jesus? [John 3:13, Proverbs 30:1-4, Philippians 1, 2 Corinthians 5, Revelation 6,20].
When the writers of the New Testament appear to explain something that Jesus said, isn't it considered similar to a teacher's commentary today-as in the story of Nicodemus? [John 3:1-21].
Catholic caller wants to challenge Steve's critique of the Catholic view of the Eucharist and the questioning of the literalness of "The Body of Christ". [John 6:53, 63, 2:9, 3:1-21, 7:37, 4:14,32, 11:11].
No one ever came back from Heaven to give a testimony of their experience, is that right, & what does it mean that Elijah is to come in John the Baptist? [John 3:13, Malachi 4:5, Luke 1:17, John 1:19-25]
Could you explain this confusing statement in John 3, about those who had ascended into heave, and Jesus being in heaven, though He was not. [John 3:13, John 7:37-39].